[ExI] Claude's text output it's now watermarked

Ben Zaiboc benzaiboc at proton.me
Mon Aug 24 14:31:11 UTC 2026


On 24/08/2026 10:34, BillK wrote:
> I see that the intention is to distinguish AI output from human output.
> But this could add to the current confusion around AI's legal status.
> At present, AI cannot be a legal "person", so it cannot be punished,
> fined or jailed for misbehaviour.
> When AI agents run wild and attack websites, the owners of the AIs
> say, "Not me, officer. It was the AI that did it."
> If Claude AI produces dangerous medical advice or makes libellous
> statements, the user will say, "It wasn't me - Claude said that."
> The legal profession needs to catch up with the speed of AI development.
> (Perhaps they can ask AI to help with that).  ��


I don't think the real reason that AI cannot be punished, fined or jailed for misbehaviour is due to its legal status.

Think about it.

-- 
Ben



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list