[ExI] diamandis commentary

[spike at rainier66.com]

-----Original Message-----
From: extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat
Subject: Re: [ExI] diamandis commentary

On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 1:09 PM Gregory Jones <spike at rainier66.com> wrote:
> The concept you claim has been abandoned has morphed into a form we may not recognize as a battleship.  It's architects have not revealed what it looks like or what it does.  They have revealed what it isn't however.  This is both intentional and highly effective.

"We have a definite design, but we can't tell you much about what it is, only that it isn't exactly what you think it is" often means they're planning something quite close to what one thinks it is based on what little they have said.

They said "battleship".

_______________________________________________


What's wrong with that term?  Nothing.  It is a ship, it is made for battle.

spike