[ExI] The Race to AGI is inevitable
sjatkins
sjatkins at protonmail.com
Fri Jun 12 19:41:59 UTC 2026
Humans seem quite efficient at persuading everyone to fight one another and to "get mine" assuming there isn't enough and never can be. I don't see why malicious AGI would have much to do.
But what if greater intelligence leads to more grounded and benevolent ethics? For instance an intelligence seeing that only by maximizing other intelligent beings positive potential can its own choice and opportunity environment be as rich as possible and be thus enabled to maximize its own positive potential?
What would a world be like where the goal is maximizing the positive potential of all humans and equivalently (or greater) intelligent beings?
It would be very different from assumption of Scarcity, never enough for everyone, get yours before someone else does world.
With AI much less AGI purportedly able to do so many jobs in a society that just assumes you must have such income and economic utility to be OK an increasing number of people greatly fear AI and technology. They fear a world that has no place for them.
A change of fundamental operating ethical basis and goal could greatly ameliorate this. Removing IP laws that effectively create artificial scarcity and massive income inequality is another part.
I believe and pretty much always have that we can reach a level of technological Abundance where all the needs and many of the desires of EVERYONE can be met with a small fraction of productive capacity. But even with uber tech like machine phase nanotech we will never reach that point with our current assumptions and attitudes and the practices that grow out of them.
Achieving the future of our dreams, achieving the fulfillment of humanity, is not just a matter of technology. It requires a quite real and necessary change of consciousness.
On Friday, June 12th, 2026 at 09:05, spike jones via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Zaiboc <benzaiboc at proton.me>
>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >>... Ben the irony here is that our best defense against malicious AI comes
> > from the defense establishment, for it understands and utilizes
> > psyops, techniques for causing one's enemy to fight himself. An
> > emergent anti-human AI would convince humans to slay each other using
> > the kind of psyops so highly effectively employed by Herr Hitler, who
> > induced otherwise civilized Germans to slay millions of their own countrymen.
> >
> > An example of modern psyops would be to convince the masses that 1)
> > they are poor, and 2) the reason they are poor is that billionaires
> > are hogging up a disproportionate (and unfair) share of "the money"
> > which is 3) a fixed quantity. Result: the masses slay the richest
> > person in town and redistribute "the wealth." Result: they become
> > poorer, for money is not a conserved quantity, and they just destroyed
> > wealth, more than they liberated. Result: they hunt the new richest
> > guy in town. Repeat until all are equally impoverished and begin to
> > devour each other. An anti-human AI could find ways to carry out psyops of that nature.
> >
> > The military uses psyops and understands the nature of such
> > operations. It has the best chances of employing countermeasures.
> >
> > spike
>
>
> >...spike,
>
> >...You're basically saying that the human military has a good chance of outthinking AI.
>
> >...Think about that for a moment.
>
> ---
> >...Ben
>
>
> Ben what I meant was humans must understand how a malicious AI would destroy humanity. It would convince humanity to fight itself using psyops. It is not clear to me how to defend against that for most humans are underinformed on AI. The countermeasures I referred to was not against AI but rather against humans who have been turned against humans.
>
> spike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 343 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20260612/91353d54/attachment.bin>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list