[ExI] Gödel's Loophole

[Adrian Tymes]

I think you're onto something.  Creating a bunch of empty states also
creates new Senators and Representatives.  If enough dummy states are
legally under the control of a single party - for sake of argument,
let's say they're individual parcels on what are currently island
territories (so as to technically have land that's not part of any
existing state), which would be granted to the Republican Party before
being made into states, that any US citizen can then be granted a
temporary proxy address in by the Republican Party (which would be the
only way to become a "resident" or "citizen" of said state) - then
that party can appoint enough members of Congress to have control of
the House and Senate, and enough of the Electoral College to appoint
the President, regardless of the will of the voters in the other
states.

There might be a legal challenge that the required "Republican Form of
Government" does not literally include "governance by whim of the
Republican Party", but if they have control of Congress and the
Presidency, they can remove any judges who do not swear party loyalty
and appoint replacements who do.  At that point, things start
resembling a classic single-party state that still technically has
elections.

Fortunately, while many Republicans in Congress might vote for that,
enough of the specific ones currently in Congress would foresee the
consequences, and know that they personally would be effectively
frozen out of governance if that happened because they have had any
ideological differences with their party leadership, that they would
not vote for such a scheme.  (Even if threatened with being primaried
and loss of party funding if they vote against it: "If this passes
then I'm definitely screwed, but if this fails then the party may have
to deal with me being in office and go back on their threats.  Better
to take a possible loss than a guaranteed loss.")  Almost none of the
Democrats would vote for it, of course.  So there wouldn't be the
votes to pass that yet.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 8:13 AM Jason Resch via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
> While that's perhaps part of it, there is another loophole that makes the former much easier.
>
> Amending Article 5 requires not just control of Congress but control of the legislatures of 75% of the states.
>
> However, adding new states requires only majority control of Congress and the president. A corrupt Congress that lacked control of 75% of the states could pass a bill that creates 150 new "dummy states" under the control of the corrupt Congress and then they can thwart the Article 5 requirement for consent of the States.
>
> So Godel likely also recognized the flaw in Article 5 having a high bar of requirements that could themselves be undermined by meeting a lower bar of requirements. He studied the Constitution studiously for many months so I am confident that few flaws escaped his notice.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026, 7:12 AM John Clark via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>> The following quote comes from:  Gödel's Loophole:
>>
>> "Gödel's Loophole is a supposed "inner contradiction" in the Constitution of the United States which Austrian-American logician, mathematician, and analytic philosopher Kurt Gödel postulated in 1947. The loophole would permit America's republican structure to be legally turned into a dictatorship. Gödel told his friend Oskar Morgenstern about the existence of the flaw and Morgenstern told Albert Einstein about it at the time, but Morgenstern, in his recollection of the incident in 1971, never mentioned the exact problem as Gödel saw it. This has led to speculation about the precise nature of what has come to be called "Gödel's Loophole". It has been called "one of the great unsolved problems of constitutional law" by American constitutional law scholar John Nowak"
>>
>> So I asked Gemini the following question:
>>
>> ME: I'd like you to read the US Constitution and then give me your opinion of what you think "Gödel's Loophole" might be, it's supposed to be a legal way to turn America's republican structure into a dictatorship.
>>
>> Gemini:   "Gödel never wrote his theory down, no one knows exactly what he found. However, constitutional scholars and legal experts have spent decades reconstructing what Gödel’s logical brain most likely spotted. The overwhelming consensus centers on a concept called self-reference hidden within Article V—the section of the Constitution that dictates how it can be amended.
>>
>> Here is how the "exploit" works in theory:
>>
>> The High Bar: Right now, amending the Constitution is incredibly difficult. It requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress and approval from three-fourths of the states.
>>
>> The Self-Amendment Glitch: Article V outlines the rules for changing the Constitution, but it does not state that Article V itself cannot be changed. This is a "strange loop"—a rule that applies to itself.
>>
>> The Downward Amendment: A highly coordinated political faction could use the existing, difficult process just once to pass an amendment that alters Article V. They could rewrite the rules to say, "From now on, the Constitution can be amended by a simple majority vote of the people currently in power."
>>
>> The Takeover: Once the barrier to changing the supreme law of the land is lowered to a simple majority, that faction could legally pass an endless stream of amendments. They could abolish the separation of powers, dismantle the Supreme Court, eliminate term limits, strip away the Bill of Rights, and formally hand all power to a dictator. This Scared Gödel
>>
>> This wasn't just a fun math puzzle for Gödel. He was born in Austria and had recently fled the Nazi regime. He had watched firsthand as interwar Austria and Weimar Germany collapsed. Crucially, those democracies did not fall to violent revolutions; they were subverted from within. Adolf Hitler and Engelbert Dollfuss used existing constitutional loopholes and emergency decrees to legally strip away democratic processes. Gödel realized the American system had a similar structural blind spot.
>>
>> In legal terms, the U.S. Constitution lacks extensive entrenchment—which is the legal practice of making certain foundational principles completely unchangeable, no matter how many people vote to change them. Aside from a tiny clause stating that no state can lose its equal representation in the Senate without its consent, almost everything in the U.S. Constitution is fair game for an amendment.
>>
>> Ultimately, Gödel's loophole teaches us a profound philosophical lesson: a constitution is a human system of trust, not a flawless mathematical formula. If a society loses its democratic norms, the text on the paper cannot save itself."
>>
>>
>> John K Clark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat