[ExI] OpenAI Reaches A.I. Agreement With Defense Dept. After Anthropic Clash

[spike at rainier66.com]

From: John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> 
….

>The term nonsense is subjective. 

 

>…But that is exactly what I was asking. What is your subjective opinion of He Who Must Not Be Named statement? My opinion is that the statement was nonsense. What is your opinion?

 

He is doing the politician thing.  I agree any AI going into a weapon cannot have guard rails controlled by a company outside the military.  That is a perfectly objective measure.  Do you agree with it?

 

 

>… Where are the equivalent super geniuses that made your mythical military AI? Where were they educated? Where are their scientific publications? If that military AI exists and if it's as good as you claim it is then those super geniuses must exist, so why can't anybody find the slightest trace of them? Have they been cloistered since birth? 

 

 John K Clark

 

 

John if you had thought that over a minute you would answer your own question.  Military people do not and cannot publish papers.  They publish inside a closed system that is closed for a reason.  They don’t necessarily invent things themselves, but they collect information from those who do.  They hang out at scientific conferences, doing far more listening than talking.  They watch and listen.  They are educated inside that closed system.  You don’t hear their names because they are not motivated by fame.  The top scientists don’t have a monopoly on smart.

 

spike

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20260303/c6aa6dc5/attachment.htm>