[ExI] ai in education

[spike at rainier66.com]

-----Original Message-----
From: extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> On Behalf Of Keith Henson via Subject: Re: [ExI] ai in education


>>... It may be that being intelligent (biologically or artificially), and being able to be completely controlled, are mutually exclusive.

>...I agree.  That's why Spike's model of what the military wants is flawed....Keith

Rather it is why Anthropic's vision of what the military wants is flawed.  The military needs something that doesn't need to be intelligent so much as it needs to be able to coordinate and control an unknown (to us) number of THAAD systems, Patriot systems, some PACs (Patriot Advanced Capability) plus several other missile defense systems (unknown to us (but well known to the operators of the golden dome.))  

Stand by for John to confidently assert that such a system doesn't exist.

Way back in the olden days when THAAD was under development, the architects of that system realized that the command and control of those missiles needed to be centralized, but that a judiciously fired salvo would overwhelm any one person or even a group.  A perfectly reasonable strategy would be to fire a number of missiles to arrive on target simultaneously in order to do exactly that: overwhelm the command and control of the defense.

Since then, multilayer defense has been developed, as well as satellite early detection and a bunch of other stuff they haven't told us about (and will not (unless or until it is used.))  The military doesn't need an LLM or an artificial master of every discipline, it needs a system that knows everything about how to control and operate the golden dome.

spike