[ExI] Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego

[Keith Henson]

OK, ask the AI of your choice, between Biden and Trump, which one is the
most corrupt.

And post the chat log here.

Keith


On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 6:41 PM <spike at rainier66.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* spike at rainier66.com <spike at rainier66.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 9 October, 2026 6:29 PM
> *To:* 'Keith Henson' <hkeithhenson at gmail.com>; 'ExI chat list' <
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> *Cc:* 'Ben Zaiboc' <benzaiboc at proton.me>; spike at rainier66.com
> *Subject:* RE: [ExI] Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles
> and San Diego
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Keith Henson <hkeithhenson at gmail.com>
> *…*
>
>
>
> >…The previous worst corruption was the Teapot Dome. Ask the AI of your
> choice to compare that corruption event to the current situation. Post the
> chat here if you wish.
>
>
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
> OK.
>
>
>
> Me: Who was the big guy getting 10% in Hunter Biden's emails
>
>
>
> I’ll look up the specific email and who the people involved said “the big
> guy” referred to.
>
>
>
> Joe Biden. That is who the people on the email said “the big guy” meant.
>
> The line is from a May 13, 2017 email written by James Gilliar, a business
> associate of Hunter Biden. It proposed how to split equity in a joint
> venture with CEFC China Energy (the SinoHawk deal). The split was roughly:
>
>
>
>    - 20% Hunter Biden
>    - 20% Rob Walker
>    - 20% James Gilliar
>    - 20% Tony Bobulinski
>    - “10 held by H for the big guy?”
>
>
>
> Tony Bobulinski, who was on the email and was lined up as CEO, has said
> since 2020 — including under oath at a 2024 House hearing — that “the big
> guy” was Joe Biden, and that Hunter sometimes called his father “the Big
> Guy” or “my Chairman.”
>
>
>
>
>
> Ja, we know, Huinter.  How well we know.
>
>
>
> Being negative on Joe Biden does not imply anything on the other
> mainstream candidate however.  It says nothing about the other mainstream
> party candidate.  There are more than two parties.  John made a case that
> the Libertarian party did matter in 2016.  This is evidence that third
> parties matter.  We actually had a good candidate in 2016, Johnson.
>
>
>
> Solution: have the mainstream candidates look at third party platforms and
> adopt as many as they can.  Then they get some of those third party votes.
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20261009/2f1c3868/attachment.htm>