[ExI] Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego

[spike at rainier66.com]

From: spike at rainier66.com <spike at rainier66.com> 
Sent: Monday, 12 October, 2026 3:09 PM
To: 'John Clark' <johnkclark at gmail.com>
Cc: 'ExI chat list' <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>; 'Ben Zaiboc' <benzaiboc at proton.me>; spike at rainier66.com
Subject: RE: [ExI] Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego

 

 

 

From: spike at rainier66.com <mailto:spike at rainier66.com>  <spike at rainier66.com <mailto:spike at rainier66.com> > 
…

 

>>…They sure as shit aren't 70 times smarter! 

 

John K Clark

 

>…  Do you wish to try again?  If your party doesn’t figure out why it lost two of those three elections, it will lose the next one with a much larger margin.  spike

 

 

 

 

 

It may feel like I am taunting you, but really I am not.  My party lost too.  I am trying to help you.  Reason: ideally from my POV the office of POTUS should change hands every election.  For the past decade, it has.  This time it might not, which leaves too much embedded power in place in the executive branch, which is a bad thing.  

 

For the democrat party to win in 28, it needs to study hard, do some deep introspection, some real soul searching, figure out why it lost two out of three with two huge advantages.  Adrian suggested voters didn’t like the way Harris was (somehow) chosen, and I agree.  Ben (I think it was Ben) suggested cheating, which is certainly possible.  You suggested the winner’s personality, which was in reality a detriment to the winner, an advantage your party will not have next time, for both Rubio and Vance are likeable enough guys and both get along with the press.  So… try again, harder this time please.

 

spike

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20261012/9317e743/attachment.htm>