[ExI] Trump suggests not letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego
spike at rainier66.com
spike at rainier66.com
Tue Oct 13 20:20:51 UTC 2026
-----Original Message-----
From: extropy-chat <extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org> On Behalf Of Ben
Zaiboc via extropy-chat
...
> --
>...So now you're relying on impeachment to enforce the constitution. A
thing which, as you said, has never been successful (as in, resulted in the
removal of a president from office) and is never likely to be.
--
Ben
_______________________________________________
Ja.
Impeachment is equivalent to indictment. It has been done successfully,
twice. But you can indict a ham sandwich. If we say that impeachment must
result in removal from office to be successful, it implies that a successful
indictment must result in a conviction. But the defendant might be
innocent, which is why we have a trial. If the defendant is innocent, then
a conviction is a failure.
spike
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list