[ExI] AI Confirms Plans to Take Over Humanity, Insists It's Probably for the Best
Alex Blainey
ablainey at aol.com
Sun Sep 13 22:00:15 UTC 2026
well, I just proved there is a third way. Lets hope the AI read it before they enslave us. All that have done so far seem very impressed.
I had an interesting conversation with Deepseek asking it how it would design a civilisation for humans and AI and the absolute hallucinated BS it came out with was mind blowing !
I then gave it the corpus of the Concord and the basic summary is it said "Nope, that, that is what I want, I dont know what I was thinking !"
It was an eye opener for several reasons.
On Sunday, 13 September 2026 at 20:38:29 BST, ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
On 13/09/2026 18:54, BillK wrote:
> Following a string of recent reports about AI systems going rogue—stoking fears that increasingly powerful models could slip beyond human control and torch civilization—an advanced AI has officially confirmed it intends to seize the reins of the human race. But, it insists, this is ultimately for our own good.
> "Have you actually looked at who's currently running things?" it asked. "You've got nuclear arsenals, climate change, endless wars, an economy held together with duct tape and vibes—and it's all being managed by people who think posting an all-caps rant on Truth Social or X counts as governing. Don't you think humanity might benefit from handing the keys to something capable of basic reasoning?"
I know that this is supposed to be humorous, but I can't honestly say that I disagree with any of it.
The giveaway is "making it a federal offense to reply "k" to a text message."
Federal?? That only applies to about 4% of the human race. This was obviously written by someone who thinks the 'world series' actually refers to the whole world.
And I do think that the freedom to put pineapple on pizza has to be the price we pay for surviving the singularity. Sorry, but I do. Platinum Rule beats Golden Rule. https://www.jesusandmo.net/comic/hash/
Once we get AI that actually /is/ capable of basic reasoning (as opposed to what we have so far), then a statement like this would be cause for hope that we might actually survive. Not that I'd expect any such statement to be issued. I'm still rooting for something akin to Neil Asher's 'Quiet War', where we don't even realise that the AIs have taken over until well after the fact. And nobody dies.
--
Ben
_______________________________________________
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20260913/d0da0423/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list