<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I just finished reading Bob Woodwards book _Plan of
Attack_ I'd heard that both the Bush and Kerry campaigns were supportive
of it and thought that Bob Woodward of Watergate fame might do a reasonable job
of </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2>inpartially reporting the facts. Michael
Moore didn't really work for me. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Some reviews here:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/074325547X//ref=pd_sim_books_1/104-8660731-7955105?v=glance&s=books&vi=reviews">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/074325547X//ref=pd_sim_books_1/104-8660731-7955105?v=glance&s=books&vi=reviews</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anyone else read this?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I found it fascinating the way Woodward was able to
report what Bush had said (he'd interviewed Bush and a lot of the players
personally) while leaving it to the reader to make their own judgement on
whether Bush was decisive or a fool. Imo, pretty much either interpretation
could be drawn depending on the readers predisposition to Bush. That's canny
political writing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Brett Paatsch</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>