<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><BR><DIV><DIV>On Jul 20, 2005, at 7:57 PM, Mike Lorrey wrote:</DIV><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; min-height: 14px; "><BR></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; min-height: 14px; "><FONT class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></FONT></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">I also find it ironic that those who hate George Bush are so militant</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">about pushing forward a change in law which was the most responsible</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">for Bush's get-out-the-vote. These same persons tend toward the</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">blame-America camp wrt 9/11, that it was US policies coming back to</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">visit us, but refuse to recognise that their claimed effect became</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">reality wrt gay marriage and Bush's reelection from their own domestic</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">policy advocacy.</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; min-height: 14px; "><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV><DIV>So you are going to blame Bush getting rerelected on some your fellow citizens simply demanding equality under the law. You are going to goad gays and lesbians and supporters of their rights for what in general you heartily (one would presume) support as a libertarian, namely a demand for equal rights and equal treatment under the law. You are further going to insult much of this group with your assumptions about their politics and your unasked for opinions about the same. This is a new low even for you. Or is it? </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>- samantha</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>p.s., You really should consider applying for work at Fox news. They would love your stuff and it is better than a lot of their material for the sort of thing it is.</DIV></BODY></HTML>