<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/6/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brandon Reinhart</b> <<a href="mailto:transcend@extropica.com">transcend@extropica.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">











<div>

<p style="margin-left: 21pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><font color="navy" face="Wingdings" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Wingdings; color: navy;"><span>Ø<font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span>     
</span></font></span></span></font>A scientific theory is a data
compression algorithm that can be extrapolated to yield further prosective data
points that can be tested by experiment.<br>
<br>
<font color="navy"><span style="color: navy;"></span></font></p>

<p><font color="navy" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>

<p><font color="navy" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: navy;">Is that the "information theoretic
theory of theorioes?"</span></font></p></div></blockquote><div>I would guess so.<br>
It's also a good bet that it is the shortest complete definition.<br>
Although Godel/Turing/Church might have something to say about that<br>
<br>
Dirk<br>
</div></div><br>