<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="City"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="country-region"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="place"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Damien, <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>You miss the point by trying to refute, take the passion of
the politics away for a moment. There are many variables in every country that
make life expectancy alone an inaccurate measure of the efficacy of the health
care system. There are so many variables beyond those complexities in the
health care system itself that you must use multiple sets of complex data to
arrive at best assessment or comparison. (think about how to measure “golden
hour infrastructure effectiveness” alone) If you make the argument socialized
vs free-enterprise systems, you lose real purpose and jump to a solution. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Life expectancy is not just a function of health care
systems, and it’s specious to argue that it is.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>If you want to improve life expectancy, then you should look
at life style, diet, location, culture, health care infrastructure, risk averseness,
infrastructure, climate, and energy.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>To sum up, yes I would prefer health care in <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Canada</st1:country-region>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">Sweden</st1:country-region>,
or <st1:country-region w:st="on">Australia</st1:country-region> to that which I
might find in <st1:City w:st="on">Los Angeles</st1:City>, but I wouldn’t
trade the health care I get where I live now near <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">Kansas City</st1:place></st1:City> for any of the above. If you want
to live long, your personal choices are one of the biggest determinants in the equation.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>