<div>does anyone have a hint as to the forecast for real estate? How long ought one wait on receding home prices to buy?</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div><BR><BR><B><I>BillK <pharos@gmail.com></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">On 11/26/06, Eugen Leitl wrote:<BR>> Classical mix is 1/3rd Ag/Au/Pt/Pd bullion (1 kg bars, not dead tree),<BR>> 1/3rd real estate (make sure you're not in a bubble -- not an option<BR>> for most in the U.S.), 1/3rd stock (energy and natural resources in<BR>> general). This assumes you're liquid, going into debt to purchase<BR>> above is probably not a good idea.<BR>><BR>> (Caveat: I'm just regurgitated advice from others I consider sensible.<BR>> YMMV, if you disagree, I would like to know why).<BR>><BR><BR>No problem in the long term with a mix of investments like that, in<BR>normal boom / slump business cycle
conditions. Just continually adjust<BR>the proportions as required for market conditions. You have to try to<BR>achieve the buy low / sell high target so far as practically possible,<BR>while doing risk management so that you are not too much committed to<BR>one market. i.e. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. Though the<BR>really *big* winners and losers are those who commit everything to one<BR>option and either win big or lose big.<BR><BR>If you *know for sure* that runaway inflation is coming then you<BR>should indeed borrow to the maximum to buy real assets. This happened<BR>accidentally to all the property owners in the UK in the period 1971<BR>to 1982 when inflation was high, maxing out at 24.3% in 1975. People<BR>who were borrowed to the maximum anyway to buy their home found that<BR>after this period they were able to repay their 'maximum' mortgage<BR>with spare change. They were almost rich! Galloping inflation had<BR>wiped out their money debt, while property
values and wages had<BR>increased along with inflation.<BR><BR>But borrowing to the maximum to invest is normally a very risky<BR>strategy. If runaway inflation doesn't appear, then you are left with<BR>large debts and large interest payments and may be forced to sell<BR>assets at a loss to reduce your debt and you end up ruined<BR>financially.<BR><BR>><BR>> Have you seen any prior Black Friday/Monday/$weekday announcements in<BR>> the press?<BR>><BR><BR>There are always articles saying "We're all doooooooommmmmed!"<BR>Economic forecasts are full of contradictory opinions. Whatever your<BR>expectation, you can always find some economists to back your opinion.<BR>You have to try to be realistic. If something sounds too good to be<BR>true, then it usually isn't true.<BR><BR>> If you're doing what the press says, and what the bulk of investors<BR>> does, you'll lose long-term. Whomever you listen to, consider Taleb's<BR>> advice.<BR>><BR><BR>True.
Buffet avoided the dotcom boom, and endured much ridicule as<BR>tech shares soared upwards. But long term, after the crash, he ended<BR>up ahead.<BR><BR>However, a few people did make millions in the dotcom boom by selling<BR>before the crash. And thousands of people lost everything by buying in<BR>and refusing to sell. Timing is everything. But active management<BR>takes a lot of time and effort. You have to make investment your main<BR>interest / hobby if you take the risky route. That life is not for<BR>everyone.<BR><BR>I agree with Rafal's recommendation of Index funds for the stock<BR>market part of your investments. This enables cautious investors to<BR>track the long term index gains for very low management costs.<BR><BR><BR>BillK<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>extropy-chat mailing list<BR>extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org<BR>http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p>
<hr size=1>Access over 1 million songs - <a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/">Yahoo! Music Unlimited.</a>