<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Heartland</b> <<a href="mailto:velvethum@hotmail.com">velvethum@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Stathis Papaioannou:<br>You're guaranteed of instant continuation after death, and in<br>fact your next conscious moment will most likely be generated by this<br>mechanism."<br><br>There is no significant difference *in type* between your conscious experience and
<br>a conscious experience of someone else so as long as there exists someone who<br>remains conscious after you die, you would have to conclude that you'd be<br>guaranteed an instant continuation after death, no?</blockquote>
<div><br>Ah ha, here seems to be the problem. The questions might be (a) how much knowledge do you possess of the universe when you "die"; and (b) do you happen to care if it is still the same when your consciousness starts running again?
<br><br>For the "instant continuation" argument to hold, the universe at the point where the brain reincarnation is activated has to look precisely like the universe at the point where the original brain incarnation was suspended (within the limits of ones capability of detecting changes in the state of the universe).
<br><br>The question becomes much fuzzier when you consider (b). Now, I don't tend to care much if my consciousness recovers itself and various objects in my bedroom have been moved around. I might wonder about it but I'm not going to get really upset. Similarly, if my bedroom objects are in the same places but all the detectable pulsars have slowed down by 3 seconds, I'm going to say hmmm.... but am not going to get really upset. However, if I recover my consciousness and things have moved around in my bedroom, and the pulsars have slowed down, and 6 billion humans have reverted to being slugs, then I will probably have a problem.
<br><br>This begs the question. If I can bring back your brain "state" don't I also have to bring back everything your brain state depends upon? [This sounds like it is leaning in the direction of the years ago blue people discussion all over again...]
<br><br>Now, you can escape from this gaping hole in the middle of your driveway by saying your brain should be recreated in an external universe consistant state. But then it seems unlikely that one could claim that is really *you*. Its *you* after some electroshock therapy.
<br><br>Robert<br><br></div></div>