<br><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I apologize Robert, I have read a few opinions on God and Religion on this list in the last year and a half and thought it would be a good time to bring up my complete and utter boiled up frustration before the list decides to put it to rest.
</blockquote><div><br>Anna, please take my comments with a grain of salt. I would be one of the first people to argue that we do not know the causal factor(s) if any which may have produced the "big bang". I am also one of the few people on the list who has a serious understanding of whether or not reality as we perceive it is a simulation (having run the numbers and thought about it a good deal).
<br><br>I consider "actions" by an unknown causal factor to be very valid way to look at either our perceived universe and/or our perception of its potentially artificial state.<br></div></div><br>However, I draw the line at "making stuff up". Since much of Christianity is based on "miracles" which either did not occur or can easily be explained using nanotechnology I view it the entire basis for Catholic and Protestant religions as problematic. This is why, I, like John, in my teenage years looked at the Western religious paradigms and said "this is bullshit". We, and many others on the list, want hard cold evidence for the things we believe in.
<br><br>When such evidence is lacking or inherently cannot be produced [1] we tend to frown upon it.<br><br>This is inherently the difference between evidence based beliefs and faith based beliefs.<br>A "wise" person clearly lays out the boundaries where the evidence is not, and perhaps may not ever, be available. If one chooses to define spirituality or "magic" as being beyond that boundary so be it. However when presenting it to others one must recognize that one is presenting "facts not in evidence" and that "followers" are acting on faith in ones interpretation.
<br>An "unwise" person simply chooses to accept whatever they are fed as "reality" because for thousands of years others less able to separate fact from fiction have accepted it as well.<br><br>As a side note, I consider myself to be a spiritual person, and I hope (to the core of my soul) that we can pull ourselves out of the deck that evolution has handed to us and transform it into something more productive going forward. On my good days I am optimistic. On my bad days, well those are my bad days.
<br><br>Robert<br><br>1. Give me a break. Just because "virgin birth" is uncommon among mammals is not a hard and fast rule that it cannot occur. A reptile in a London Zoo underwent "virgin birth" in the last year. And outlining the various ways nanotechnology can be used to turn water into wine or that human bodies can be resurrected, well they are too many to count on one, maybe two hands.
<br>