<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/18/09, <b class="gmail_sendername">Anne Corwin</b> <<a href="mailto:sparkle_robot@yahoo.com">sparkle_robot@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Mike Dougherty wrote:<br>> I am not going to propose another definition for<br>> transhumanism, since<br>
> there are already so many.<br><br>I'll propose one, just for fun: transhumanism is a set of loosely interwoven beliefs, predilections, and tendencies that ultimately lead to endless arguments on mailing lists over the definition of "transhumanism".<br>
<br>:P<br><br>- Anne</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I think this is sort of like that science is what scientists do, so therefore transhumanism is what transhumanists do. And, ergo, religion is what religious people do. So we here we have the answer to many of our fundamental questions, and that is that they weren't all that important in the first place.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><em>Kevin</em></div><br> </div>