<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jun 29, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Damien Broderick wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>I still look forward to reading your explanation of how psi that affects perhaps one guess in 1000 would destroy the profits of lotto companies</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>One in 1000, interesting. As Keith Henson just wrote:</div><div><br></div><div>"so the people proposing the existence of psi abilities have the interesting task of proposing a model in which something keeps psi abilities down close to the noise range. Such as: the ability to see into the future provides no reproductive advantage".</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Is it possible that you *don't* understand how lotto profits are distributed?<br></div></blockquote><br></div><div>Is it possible that you *don't* understand that not all lotteries are parimutuel? </div><div><br></div><div> John K Clark</div><div><h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="7"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 72px;"><b><br></b></span></font></span></h1></div></body></html>