<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> John Clark <jonkc@bellsouth.net><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> ExI chat list <extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Fri, September 17, 2010 9:30:02 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [ExI] Domestication<BR></FONT><BR>Anybody have a theory why the asian elephant has been domesticated but not the African elephant? And it's not just animals, with all the millions of species to work with why have so few new domesticated plants come on the scene in the last few centuries?
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> John K Clark<BR>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR> I am just speculating here but I think it could simply be lack of sustained effort amongst Afican cultures. The habitat of the African elephant is mostly restricted to Sub-Saharan Africa which has historically hosted primarily hunter-gatherer tribesman until recent times and colonialism. The high civilizations of ancient Africa such as Egypt, Carthage, Numidia, Kush, etc. were mostly in Northern Africa along the mediterrenean and it would have probably been very difficult for them to move elephants across the Sahara.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Despite, it is a known historical fact that Carthage domesticated elephants for use as war elephants (c.f. Hannibal and Punic War) and these would have had to have been the African variety although some think it was a subs-species of African Elephant called the North African Elephant. In any case, the complete genocide of Carthage by the Romans probably set the art of taming elephants in Africa back by several hundred years.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It is a widely believed myth that the African elephants can't be tamed. During colonization of the Belgian Congo the Belgians used Indian Mahouts, who simply applied the ages old Indian techniques, to successfully train African elephants. These days you can even go on safari in Africa from the back of an African elephant for the right price:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://www.thesafaricompany.co.za/Elephant_Back_Safaris.htm">http://www.thesafaricompany.co.za/Elephant_Back_Safaris.htm</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>So in short, I blame the Romans.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Stuart LaForge<BR>"Old men read the lesson in the setting sun.<BR>Beat the cymbal and sing in this life, or wail away the hours fearing death.<BR>Their choice is their fortune." - I Ching </DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></div><br>
</body></html>