<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Feb 16, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Richard Loosemore wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Verdana; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><blockquote type="cite">So I repeat my previous request, please tell us all about the wonderful AI program that you have written that does things even more intelligently than Watson.<br></blockquote><br>Done: read my papers.</span></blockquote><br></div><div>I'm not asking for more endless philosophy, I'm asking for programs. I'm asking you to tell us what you have taught a computer to do that caused it to behave anywhere near as intelligently as Watson; a program you claim to have contempt for as well as for its creators. But to be honest I can't help but wonder if contempt is the right word and if there might be a better one. </div><div><br></div><div> John K Clark</div><br></body></html>