<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><div><span>scerir wrote:</span></div><span><div><br>> Now If OPERA results were taken as true, the neutrinos would</div><div>> lead the gamma flux by on the order of 1 e^(10) seconds for SN1987A.</div><div> </div><div>I wrote:</div><div><br>> Was anyone looking for a second signal 300+ years ago?</div><div> </div><div><span>scerir wrote:</span><br><br>> not to mention the superspeed of gravitons!</div><div> </div><div>The model of gravity I support is two component - one a flux of</div><div>supraluminal particles creating the main force of gravity, the second</div><div>are luminal speed carriers which act as a modifier. The second</div><div>luminal component generates what is approximated as MOND</div><div>in the description of the velocity profiles of spiral galaxies. These</div><div>same
two carriers are also <var id="yui-ie-cursor"></var>part of the alternative quantum mechanics</div><div>I support.</div><div> </div><div>As mentioned in a previous post General Relativity plus Dark Matter</div><div>is no longer a viable explanation of the velocity profiles of spiral</div><div>galaxies - the statistical mechanics of that explanation is impossible.</div><div> </div><div>Dennis May</span></div><div><br><br><br><br> </div></div></body></html>