<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><div id="yiv1229752914"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div><span id="yiv1229752914yui_3_2_0_17_131713101601857">Dan <span id="misspell-0">Ust</span> wrote:</span></div><div><span id="yiv1229752914yui_3_2_0_17_131713101601869"></span> </div><div><span id="yiv1229752914yui_3_2_0_17_131713101601872">> ...Dennis might bring up other reasons he believes <span id="misspell-1">STR</span> is wrong </span></div><div><span id="yiv1229752914yui_3_2_0_17_131713101601881">> and needs to be replaced. I don't necessarily agree with him, but he </span></div><div><span id="yiv1229752914yui_3_2_0_17_131713101601887">> didn't come to these views because of some recent
data.</span></div><span></span></div><span></span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>The only thing separating LET relativity from Einstein relativity</span></div><div><span>is the non-detection of preferred frames of reference. The mathematics</span></div><div><span>are identical - the interpretations different.</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>Once any preferrred reference frame or effect requiring differing</span></div><div><span>reference frames is detected LET relativity can be adapted to</span></div><div><span></span><span>include these other reference frames. Adapting Einstein relativity</span></div><div><span>involves changing it from a causal theory to one which no longer</span></div><div><span>accepts causality. Paradoxes multiply without bound.</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>The kind of QM I support </span><span>requires an LET-like relativity and<var
id="yui-ie-cursor"></var></span></div><div><span>as a result things like the CMBR can be seen as a non-linear</span></div><div><span>QM effect totally unrelated to any Big Bang theory - among other</span></div><div><span>alternative explanations for several astronomical observations.</span><span></div><div><br>Special Relativity is brittle - LET is adaptable.</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"><span id="yiv1229752914yui_3_2_0_17_1317131016018113">Dan <span id="misspell-2">Ust</span> wrote:</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"><br>> Dennis would also have an alternative paradigm here [General </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times,
serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">> Relativity]. Again, not that I agree with him on this, but I'm not </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">> wed to any particular theory. I'm also sure, too, most here would </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">>
change their minds if the evidence is corroborated or a better </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">> alternative were presented.</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"> </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/02/110223092406.htm">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/02/110223092406.htm</a></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"> </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">The work of Professor Stacy <span id="misspell-3">McGaugh</span> is very straight forward.</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">If you examine spiral galaxies with nearly identical amounts of </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">visible matter they should have a variety of velocity profiles </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">because the "Dark Matter" required to fix General Relativity is</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">independent of the visible matter. What is found instead is spiral</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">galaxies with nearly identical amounts of visible matter have nearly</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">identical velocity profiles. Other astronomical predictions</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">require Dark Matter concentrations to vary widely from local</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new
roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">visible matter concentrations. The statistical mechanics of the</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">situation is impossible - General Relativity as a general theory</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">is <span id="misspell-4"><span>disproved</span></span> by observation.</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"> </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255,
255);" class="ms__id22596">I support an alternative related to Professor Stacy <span id="misspell-5">McGaugh's</span> </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">support for <span id="misspell-6">MOND</span> theory. <span id="misspell-7">MOND</span> has no mechanism at present. </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">My theory is a mechanism to give <span id="misspell-8">MOND</span>-like results. It is a</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">kind of Le Sage gravity with two components. The <span id="misspell-9">supraluminal</span></div><div
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">component is the primary source of gravity. The <span id="misspell-10">luminal</span> </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">component is the <span id="misspell-11">MOND</span>-like modifier. These carriers are also</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">the carriers enabling <span id="misspell-12">deBB</span>-like quantum mechanics.</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596"> </div><div style="color:
rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="ms__id22596">Dennis May<br> </div></div></body></html>