<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><div id="yiv1364546111"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div id="yiv1364546111yui_3_2_0_18_131713101601843"><span id="yiv1364546111yui_3_2_0_18_131713101601857"><span id="misspell-0" class="mark">Tomaz</span> Kristan wrote:</span></div><div><br id="yiv1364546111yui_3_2_0_18_131713101601845">> The question is how big the revision must be. Depends on which is true:<br><br>> ...c is a little higher and photons are a bit slower than c. Neutrinos </div><div>> travel with a velocity between those two. Minor revisions,...</div><div> </div><div>I mentioned in a previous post that orthodox physics might take this</div><div>view if the experimental results hold
up.</div><div> </div><div>Neutrinos travel faster than observable light because they are not</div><div>interacting with the E&M components of the vacuum as strongly</div><div>as light does. This creates an ideal speed of light c versus a </div><div><span id="misspell-1"><span>measurable</span></span> speed of light c' with neutrinos doing whatever they</div><div>do.</div><div> </div><div>Next you will need to see if there are preferred frame of reference</div><div>for neutrino speed n' which is believed to be less than ideal c.</div><div>In large frames of reference it will become possible to send</div><div>and decode signals faster than c'. </div><div> </div><div>If yet other effects are discovered or other particles exhibit unique</div><div>speeds the simplicity of Einstein Relativity and claims of no</div><div><span id="misspell-2"><span>preferred<var id="yui-ie-cursor"></var></span></span> reference frames will become
harder and harder to</div><div>justify. Then we are back to some form of LET-like theory.</div><div> </div><div>Dennis May</div><div> </div><div><br><br> </div></div></div></div></body></html>