<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><div id="yiv888643993"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div><span id="yiv888643993yui_3_2_0_27_131713101601857">Jeff Davis wrote:</span></div><div><span id="yiv888643993yui_3_2_0_27_131713101601863"></span> </div><div><span id="yiv888643993yui_3_2_0_27_131713101601866">> My picture of ***3D space*** at the Plank level is a 3D collection of<br>> contiguous points. The universe as a bag of beads. Now, what happens<br>> to these points? Presumably, at any given "now", each point has its<br>> own set of ten (or eleven, or ?) parametric values for the<br>> corresponding ten "dimensions" of the Standard Model. Then, after<br>> what we refer to as the Plank "time interval", these parameters<br>>
achieve their next value in the next iteration of the "now". </span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>The concept of Planck-Time has been observationally discredited:</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span><a href="http://www.moondaily.com/reports/Astronomers_Deal_Another_Blow_To_Quantum_Theories_Of_Time__Space__Gravity.html">http://www.moondaily.com/reports/Astronomers_Deal_Another_Blow_To_Quantum_Theories_Of_Time__Space__Gravity.html</a><var id="yui-ie-cursor"></var></span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>Dennis May</span></div><div id="yiv888643993yui_3_2_0_27_1317131016018113"> </div><div><br><br> </div></div></div></div></body></html>