<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><div><span>Dan <span id="misspell-0" class="mark">Ust</span> wrote:</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>> ... In my opinion, better to avoid war all together than to arm for it<br>...Dan<br></span></div><div><span>Spike wrote:</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>> History's lesson is that the way to avoid war altogether is to arm for it.<br>> Weakness is provocation. </span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>The happy medium is to let private security agencies arm</span></div><div><span>themselves as they see fit. If they invest wisely in advanced</span></div><div><span>weapons which prevent war they have done so by non-coercive</span></div><div><span>means while avoiding the terrible cost of actual war.</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>A well armed
populace is a <span id="misspell-1"><span>deterrent</span></span> to invasion. Advanced</span></div><div><span>abilities to deal with issues anywhere on the globe can</span></div><div><span>deter some kinds of attacks. A very big topic in general.</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>Dennis May</span></div><div> <br><br></div></div></body></html>