<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><div><span>Anders <span id="misspell-0" class="mark">Sandberg</span> wrote:</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div><span>> Once enhancement is the mainstream the non-enhanced </span></div><div><span>> will start to be at a disadvantage they could try to claim </span></div><div><span>> a moral compensation for.</span></div><div><span></span> </div><div>If enhancement is viewed as bringing an advantage</div><div>the mindset of many will be to hobble that advantage</div><div>through taxation, restrictions of various kinds, or</div><div>using coercive means to provide those advantages</div><div>to others at no cost or a reduced cost.</div><div> </div><div>Coercion against <span id="misspell-1"><span>enhancement</span></span> is the more immediate</div><div>issue.</div><div><br>Dennis
May</div></div></body></html>