<div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_extra">What is their ideological tenets? Because I suspect you are not
describing a real view, but rather your strawman view of something
you do not like. So you pick up examples of people saying outrageous
things and bundle them together into "this is what they think". </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, I didnīt chose a Mr Nobody to show an example. If you can read Spanish you can read<a href="http://www.jorgevalin.com/artic/heroes_libertad.htm"> here the article</a> where I found this quote. He writes in Libertad Digital. The owner of this newspaper is Federico Jimenez Losantos, one of the most important businessman in Spain. If you know somebody from Spain, ask him about Federico Jimenez Losantos. If your friend is older than 18, he knows him. Their only ideology is this radical anarchism where freedom is superior to all the other human rights.<br>
<br></div><div>Still, we here have a public health system that cost 1500 per person every year and that provides with FULL health asistance. Full means Full. Everything is free. Or was. <br><br>It was perfectly sustainable and was universal, for everybody even if you were not Spanish, because a human life is most important than the cost of their treatment. But the Spanish liberals have dismantled it. So now, only the rich people can pay their treatments. Is this humanism? In fact, even from an economic point of view is not intelligent: Healthy people works better and epidemics spreaded are more expensive than epidemics controlled.<br>
<br></div><div>Also, suing somebody is not free anymore. Only people who can pay can sue someone. Poor people are helpless.<br><br></div><div>Is this liberal system where only rich people can have their health treated or can be protected by the judiciary compatible with humanism? Donīt even respect human life.<br>
</div><div><br><br></div></div>