<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px;">BillK <pharos@gmail.com> wrote:</span><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16.363636016845703px; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16.363636016845703px; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>What Brent needs is the standard statement that by law in the UK all</span><br></div><div style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div
class="y_msg_container">investment companies must quote in their offers. <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Quote:</span><br>Past performance is not a guide to the future. Market and exchange<br>rate movements may cause the capital value of investments, and the<br>income from them, to go down as well as up and the investor may not<br>get back the amount originally invested.<<</div><div class="y_msg_container"><br></div><div class="y_msg_container">Yes. :)</div><div class="y_msg_container"><br></div><div class="y_msg_container">In the world of investments it is practically or actually illegal to suggest that any asset will appreciate according to some "Law," whether it be a type of Moore's Law or otherwise, and this as it ought to be. </div><div class="y_msg_container"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div class="y_msg_container"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Economics is called "the dismal science" for good reason. It is a
social science, not a natural science.</span></div><div class="y_msg_container"><br></div><div class="y_msg_container">Gordon</div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>