<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>>…</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Kelly Anderson<br><b>Subject:</b> [ExI] Attention Spans Decreasing?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>>…So what do you think? Do you think your attention span has decreased over time? Do you think the attention spans of your associates and family members has gone down? Kelly<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There is no doubt we are seeing decreased attention spans everywhere. Before I get to that, this commentary postulates a related ability we have gained as we have lost the ability to focus for long periods: the ability to filter irrelevant info at a remarkable speed and effectiveness.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Evidence is abundant. Consider such late 50s early 60s TV examples as Perry Mason, which can now be viewed free: <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="http://www.tv.com/shows/perry-mason/watch/the-case-of-the-final-fadeout-79640/">http://www.tv.com/shows/perry-mason/watch/the-case-of-the-final-fadeout-79640/</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Note the long stretches between commercial breaks. If you had the patience to sit through these marvelous masterpieces to get to the courtroom arguments, you will notice that it is difficult for us to follow: you need to concentrate on what they are saying. I loved this show as a 7 yr old child. Now I have a hard time sitting still long enough. These shows were once called dramas. Now they wouldn’t be called that; no helicopter chases, no nothing, just heads talking.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Note Scientific American articles from the same era, compare with Scientific American today.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Compare the general pace of movies from the 1940s with any movie made today, the length of the scenes, the general depth of thought required.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Consider my favorite scientific writing, the seventh chapter of Darwin’s Origin of Species. Think about what that man had to do in order to write that chapter. He had to sit quietly and watch, for hour after hour, ponder what he was seeing, watch some more. I am astonished by Darwin’s observational skills, beyond what is seen in scientists today. We are accustomed to things happening at a much faster pace.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>This leads to the second conjecture: the internet and video games have made us much more skilled at dealing with floods of data, figuring out how to filter it and get just what we need. I have a friend who is in his 70s, a doctor (the one who introduced me to Dr. Christine Lajuenesse who was the young lady who was shot by a crazy bastard and we sent the get-well wishes.) This doctor had a very busy practice until a couple years ago, so he didn’t have much time for twiddling away the hours on the “internets” until very recently. I became his advisor and got him going after his semi-retirement. He experienced the whole head rush most of us here experienced in the 90s with all that free information now available right in our own homes.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There is a skill most of us developed twenty or more years ago as we learned what a large fraction of all that information on the internet is bullshit. Free and worth every penny. We learned to figure out quickly what was nonsense, what was speculation, what was solid fact, what was cool, etc. We have gotten good at it.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>My son’s generation started right out knowing they could find anything they wanted to know on the internet, but that much of the info was wrong. But I saw something else cool: they seem to be really good at filtering out peripheral info and focusing down on the critical stuff. They go right to the heart of the matter. The evidence I found is in watching how the kids play Mario Brothers. I saw college students who orated at length on how good they were at this Mario game or that. Then when my second-grader son and his friends wanted to play, they smote the astonished and appalled college students, who went away with an entirely new and humble attitude, thinking perhaps they weren’t quite as good as they had previously thought.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I have an alternative explanation: as we grow older, we start to take in more information and process more information. The children focus right down on the critical core. To them, old people appear slow. Not necessarily stupid, just slower. Reason: we are dealing with a lot more information, and seeing a lot more alternatives simultaneously.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>This theory explains why kids are effective programmers but that their software isn’t necessarily well designed.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>If you are still reading down this far, I speculate that you are one of the older guys here, one who doesn’t give up after the second paragraph, tossing it aside with a casual TLDR.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>spike<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>