<div dir="ltr"><div>Here is a funny little paper I stumbled into recently (after being tipped off about black hole skeptics):</div><div><br></div><div>"The calculations of general relativity on massive celestial bodies collapsing into singular black holes are wrong"</div><div><a href="http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/physics/astrophysics/The%20calculations%20of%20general%20relativity%20on%20massive%20celestial%20bodies%20collapsing%20into%20singular%20black%20holes%20are%20wrong.pdf">http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/physics/astrophysics/The%20calculations%20of%20general%20relativity%20on%20massive%20celestial%20bodies%20collapsing%20into%20singular%20black%20holes%20are%20wrong.pdf</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>"Cosmology should directly use the Doppler's formula to calculate the red shift of Ia supernova"<br></div><div><a href="http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/physics/astrophysics/Cosmology%20should%20directly%20use%20the%20Doppler's%20formula%20to%20calculate%20the%20red%20shift%20of%20Ia%20supernova.pdf">http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/physics/astrophysics/Cosmology%20should%20directly%20use%20the%20Doppler's%20formula%20to%20calculate%20the%20red%20shift%20of%20Ia%20supernova.pdf</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#Observational_evidence">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#Observational_evidence</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Anyway the reason I bring this up is because of the interesting SETI context, like:</div><div><a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.4362.pdf">http://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.4362.pdf</a><br></div><div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_signature">- Bryan<br><a href="http://heybryan.org/">http://heybryan.org/</a><br>1 512 203 0507</div>
</div></div>