<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra">On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Bryan Bishop <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kanzure@gmail.com" target="_blank">kanzure@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div></span></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">>> Be honest now, does this excuse put forward to explain away the lack of large scale engineering really strike you as credible?</blockquote></div><br></span>> How do you know you are not observing large-scale engineering?<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If large-scale engineering looks exactly like non-large non-engineering then I can not know. But does it? I don't think so.<br><br></div><div>  John K Clark<br></div><div><br></div>
<br></div><br></div></div>