<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 2016-03-02 21:13, Tara Maya wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D9D9D9DB-AB86-468C-B0A1-86367C589E84@taramayastales.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">A nude video being taken is a huge violation. It’s a
form of sexual assault. It’s not some funny little prank.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The problem is that it depends on who it is. BillK is likely
entirely OK in joking about a hypothetical Spike video, while to
others a nude video can indeed be a sexual assault and is no joking
matter at all. A lot of it depends on whether one belongs to a
vulnerable group, or how the video is spread. <br>
<br>
It seems that the key issues is (1) a nude video means the intimate
sphere has been made public, having a chilling effect on it even
when there is no risk of outside peeking (this can be made even
worse by outsider malicious comments - they can put their barbs more
closely to the skin, so to say), and (2) the lack of control over
the released information - integrity is about being able to control
your information, and once it is out there you cannot do much to
regain it in that domain.<br>
<br>
The problem with these is that neither can be remedied well with
technology or law. Adding astronomical fines will not deter people
if they think they can get away with it. Many intimate videos are
made for consumption inside a relationship, but leak out anyway. "A
right to be forgotten" is complicated to achieve outside a social
context. <br>
<br>
One day we may build the cryptographic memory-DRM society of the
Oubliette in "A Quantum Thief". But until then it will be hard to do
something general and effective. <br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Anders Sandberg
Future of Humanity Institute
Oxford Martin School
Oxford University</pre>
</body>
</html>