<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">> Pain and suffering are different things: one is a sensory stimulus, the</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">> other is the aversive emotional reaction (which can be triggered by non-pain</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">> stimuli too). anders</span><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">There are pain clinics that specialize in intractable pain. They do not use drugs, which of course have already been tried. What they do is to convince the person off the above - that they can feel the pain but not suffer - a dissociation if you will. The correlation between pain and suffering is far from linear.</span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Most of you will be familiar with Lazarus Long of Heinlein fame. When he went in for rejuvenation they considered whether to remove certain memories, so this idea is relatively old. </span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">anders, as a consequentialist, I think you must argue that pain never remembered and never causing any future harm is not per se wrong. In fact, pain now can mean learning to avoid dangerous things and so is a good thing. A 'life of amnesiac bliss' would mean that a person would never learn to avoid painful situations. Surely circumcision has always been done with a good result in mind, though intentions are irrelevant to some..</span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Now this may be more debatable: should a person be subjected to capricious pain and humiliation just because it has always been done that way? I am thinking of fraternity initiations. I experienced it directly. When the national organization of lambda chi came down with instructions to eliminate hazing, some ot the brothers objected strongly. They thought that if the new group did not go through what they went through that they were not fully brothers in the frat. I have seen informal initiations and they were at times vicious. </span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"comic sans ms",sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">bill w</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:54 PM, BillK <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pharos@gmail.com" target="_blank">pharos@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 14 June 2016 at 21:25, Anders wrote:<br>
> Pain and suffering are different things: one is a sensory stimulus, the<br>
> other is the aversive emotional reaction (which can be triggered by non-pain<br>
> stimuli too). Pain is not bad in itself, but one can make a case that<br>
> suffering is something that is inherently bad.<br>
><br>
> If one argues suffering is inherently bad, then even forgotten suffering is<br>
> a bad thing. At least it made the world worse when it was occurring.<br>
><br>
> Remembered suffering is not obviously as bad as experiencing suffering: at<br>
> least pain cannot be remembered vividly (you don't flinch from remembering a<br>
> bad toothache or an injury, even though it is still unpleasant to remember -<br>
> compare that to remembering something truly disgusting: you feel similar<br>
> disgust again). Suffering, being a strong inducer of neural plasticity, can<br>
> of course change behavior and outlook in important ways. But not all such<br>
> changes are bad ones.<br>
><br>
> So I would argue that instantaneous suffering matters morally. Just as<br>
> instantaneous pleasure does. However, the time-bound forms of suffering or<br>
> happiness have potential for *meaning*. That adds another dimension that can<br>
> be far more important. Living a life of amnesiac bliss might not be as good<br>
> as a long dramatic struggle to make the world better.<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</span>Remembered suffering = PTSD and that ruins lives.<br>
<br>
PTSD victims would welcome amnesia.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
BillK<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
extropy-chat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>