<div dir="ltr">The second sentence of my post is:<div><br></div><div>Let's avoid discussing the elections on this list.</div><div><br></div><div>The last sentence of my post is:</div><div><br></div><div>I won't further respond to any election-related posts from you.</div><div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM, John Clark <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnkclark@gmail.com" target="_blank">johnkclark@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Rafal Smigrodzki </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:rafal.smigrodzki@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafal.smigrodzki@gmail.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">>></div> Hillary Clinton sent Humayun to his death at the hands of Islamic terrorists, for short term political gain.</blockquote><br><font size="4"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">>> </div>Apparently Humayun Khan's parents don't agree with you, </font></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">> </div>### That may be the case, although I did not discuss the issue with Mr Khan and I don't really know what he is thinking through all this commotion.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font size="4">I don't see why it would be necessary to discuss it with him, Mr. Khan made it abundantly clear in his speech at the Democratic convention that nominated Hillary Clinton what his views were. And in response to Mr. Khan's speech Trump produced this self contradictory gem:</font></font></div></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font size="4"><i>"Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."</i></font><br></div><div><br></div><div><font size="4">If Donald Trump had actually read the Constitution he'd know that Mr. Khan DOES have a right to say whatever he wants in front of as many people that want to listen to him. And yet for reasons that absolutely baffle me libertarians seem to have a certain fondness for this fascist. It's weird. And yes I know many libertarians intend to vote for Gary Johnson, but it takes 270 electoral votes to become president and I will give 3 to 1 odds that Johnson will not get one single electoral vote. Johnson will get zero votes, zip nada zilch <span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">goose</span> <span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">egg</span>. </font></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">>></div> Let's avoid the subject of elections on this list. It is odious.</blockquote><br><font size="4"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">>> </div>Shouldn't you have said that at the very start of your post rather than at the very end after talking about Hillary Clinton and "short term political gain"?</font></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">> </div>### Let's avoid the subject of elections on this list.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><font size="4"><br></font></div><div><font size="4"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">I've seen this before, after a long post on subject X it ENDS with something like, "we should never talk about subject X again", which really means I and only I should have the last word on subject X. It would be far more convincing if the FIRST and only sentence in the post was "</div> Let's avoid subject <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">X</div> on this list<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">", I'd still disagree but at least it wouldn't be self contradictory.</div></font></div><div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><font size="4"><br></font></div></div><div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><font size="4"> John K Clark</font></div></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>
</div></div>