<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:18 AM, spike </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:spike66@att.net" target="_blank">spike66@att.net</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"> <br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">​><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>…</span><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">Come on Spike, do you really need to invent wild conspiracy theories involving an international crime ring run by the Clintons to explain violence directed against Americans in an Islamic country during a civil war?   John K Clark  ​<u></u><u></u></span></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><u></u> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri,sans-serif"></span></p><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>I do need some kind of wild conspiracy theory to explain why the embassy was not evacuated when we knew there were credible threats.<p></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​</div><font size="4">There are <b>ALWAYS</b><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><b>​</b> ​</div>credible threats<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>against the American ambassador of a<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>Islamic country during a civil war, <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​it ​</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​</div>comes with the job. Ambassador Stevens<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>could have evacuated the embassy but he chose not to, and on 2 separate occasions in the month before the attack he was offered more security guards and he said no both times.<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ It's</div> true I can't prove the ambassador wasn't murdered by thugs hired by Hillary Clinton to protect her international crime empire, but you can't prove he wasn't murdered by thugs hired by Gary Johnson<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>to protect<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>his<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>international crime empire. Both are equally possible. <br><br>John K Clark</font></div><div><br></div><br></div><br></div></div>