<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Fri, 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Dave Sill </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:sparge@gmail.com" target="_blank">sparge@gmail.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="gmail-"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">​<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​>> ​</div><font size="4">If I could only ask one question to a presidential candidate to gauge their Libertarian tendencies it would be "<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">Should terminally ill patients be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide?";  <a href="http://isidewith.com" target="_blank">isidewith.com</a> asked them this very question and here are the results: </span></font></div><div class="gmail_quote"><font size="4">Donald Trump<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ refused to answer.</div></font></div><div class="gmail_quote"><font size="4"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​</div>Hillary Clinton<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ said "yes".</div></font></div><font size="4">Gary Johnson<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ said "​</div>Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​".</div></font></div></div></blockquote></span></div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="gmail-"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><font size="4"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"></div></font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><font size="4"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">I find it very interesting that ​</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​</div>Hillary Clinton<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ gave a more libertarian answer than the Libertarian Party candidate. </div><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">​</span></font></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>That doesn't mean anything. She's reversed herself many times and I seriously doubt she'd approve it without a psych exam. Dont' zing Johnson for giving a more complete answer.<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​<font size="4">If you are a true libertarian ​and are asked </font></div><font size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"> "</div>Should terminally ill patients be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide?"<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​  </div></font><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">then "yes but" is not a more complete answer it is a inferior answer than "yes".</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"> And there are no ifs ands or even buts about it.</div></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>A more telling question would be "Should adults be allowed to end their lives?"</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><font size="4">Belgium<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ recently passed a law allowing ​</div>terminally ill minor<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​s​</div> <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​of any age ​</div>to die<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​,​</div> <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​and I congratulate Belgium for doing so. And a minor has already made use of the new law.</div></font></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><br></div></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/child-dies-by-euthanasia-in-belgium-where-assistance-in-dying-is-legal/">http://www.cbsnews.com/news/child-dies-by-euthanasia-in-belgium-where-assistance-in-dying-is-legal/</a><br></div></div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font size="4">​  John K Clark​</font></div><br></div></div><br></div></div>