<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Stuart LaForge </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:avant@sollegro.com" target="_blank">avant@sollegro.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>ultimately both calculations<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>were irrelevant because both calculations disagreed with QM predictions<br>
and results.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">​<font size="4">Mine didn't! Using common sense and classical physics as givens I proved ​that it was impossible to violate Bell's inequality, I then showed why quantum mechanics said it could be violated and explained that the experiment has been performed and there is no longer any doubt about it, Bell's inequality IS violated .</font></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>John on the otherhand seems to believe that he really does choose the<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>angle of the polararizer or direction of magnetic field when conducting an<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>experiment, thus preserving his free will at the cost of realism,<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>local-determinism, or both. John Clark, care to comment?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​<font size="4">No, but tell me what on earth "free will" means and I might want to comment about it.​</font></div><font size="4"> <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​</div></font></div><div><font size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><br></div></font></div><div><font size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"> J​ohn K Clark</div></font></div><div><font size="4"><br></font></div><div><br></div><div> </div></div><br></div></div>