<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:21 AM, William Flynn Wallace </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:foozler83@gmail.com" target="_blank">foozler83@gmail.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>About which I know nothing.  But - I read awhile back that the New Math was a disaster.  That was long ago, but are they still teaching that?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><font size="4">Tom Lehrer<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ ​</div>gave the best explanation of the New Math that I've seen:</font><br><div> </div><div><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIKGV2cTgqA">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIKGV2cTgqA</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font size="4">​John K Clark​</font></div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>