<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Hi Clark,</p>
    <p>The single binding neuron, like glutamate, is just a simplified
      theoretical (i.e. testable) theory that will surely can be easily
      proven wrong.  It simply represents a required functional part of
      consciousness, what is required to make very complex compost
      qualitative experiences.  We are aware of all of the diversity,
      all at the same time as one composite experience.  When people do
      a traditional neural substitution, they end up removing this
      required critical functionality, causing all the hard problems. 
      The single neuron represents any theoretically possible way of
      binding all possible elemental qualities into the diverse
      composite qualitative picture of the world we experience.  If you
      include whatever accomplishes this, however you may theorized it
      could be possible, in the neuro substitution,  you will not have
      any hard (as in impossible) problems emerge, and everyone will
      know, via subjective and objective observation what is going on at
      every step of the neuro substitution.</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Brent</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/15/2017 1:44 PM, John Clark wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAJPayv2OTUP6JPR10EYq0mdhgbmbrBtpHwMcjzJWWG4cfBrVdA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span
            style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at
            12:47 AM, Brent Allsop </span><span dir="ltr"
            style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:brent.allsop@gmail.com" target="_blank">brent.allsop@gmail.com</a>></span><span
            style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span></div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote"><br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​>
                  ​</div>
                Now, when you say you replace glutamate with glycene,
                and you replace the glutamate receptor with a glycene
                receptor, then assert that the comparison neuron will
                behave the same, you are removing the important
                comparison functionality,</div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><font
                  size="4">​I agree, but the brain is more than just one
                  neuron. If you swapped the way a neuron responds to
                  new red and green signals coming from your eyes
                  without also changing how your memories are associated
                  with red and green then you'd stop your car at green
                  lights and drive through red ones.</font></div>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><font
                  size="4"><br>
                </font></div>
            </div>
            <div><font size="4">
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">John
                  K Clark  ​</div>
                 </font></div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>