<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Tomaz Kristan </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:protokol2020@gmail.com" target="_blank">protokol2020@gmail.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>So tiny dx doesn't sound very convincing to me. The odds for an error are substantial.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">​</font><font size="4">So what detail of the interferometer design have you discovered that makes the error bars larger than those stated in the paper? If you were building those two very complex interferometers how would you have made them differently?</font></div></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>In other words, some fancy data about the measurement equipment<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​ [...]​</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​<font size="4">If you're going to have any hope of ever detecting gravitational waves ​you're going to need fancy </font></div><font size="4">measurement equipment<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​, very fancy indeed.​</div></font></div><div><font size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><br></div></font></div><div><font size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"> John K Clark</div></font></div><div><br></div><div> </div></div></div></div>