<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>On Jun 1, 2017, at 5:06 PM, John Clark <<a href="mailto:johnkclark@gmail.com">johnkclark@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><font size="4">The January 4 2017 event gives more support to the idea Dark Matter <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">is</div> <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">made of </div>primordial Black Holes born a nanosecond after the Big <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">Bang</div> and were never stars. The spin of one of the Black <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">H</div>oles is not in the same direction <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">as </div>the other<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"></div> and <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">of </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">their orbit, </div> binary stars almost always are. If there were born at different times and at different places the universe is now so spread out it is unlikely there would be enough time for the two to find each <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">other </div>and go into orbit, but very very early in the universe thing<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">s</div> were much more crowded and that would be more likely to happen. If LIGO can eve<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">r</div> find a merger where one of the Black Holes was less than 3 solar masses that would be the smoking gun, that <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">guy </div>would have to be primordial.</font><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font size="4">In addition, some rival theories to Einstein's say gravitational waves don't all travel at the same speed but depends on their frequency, this merger was twice as far away as the previous two so it's the best test yet of that , and Einstein wins again, all the waves move at the same speed (presumably light speed) regardless of frequency.</font></div></div></div></blockquote><br><div>Would that be dark matter in the usual sense of the term -- as in an exotic form of matter we expect to be very different from quarks and leptons even when they're collapsed into a black hole?</div><div><br></div><div><div style="line-height: normal;"><span style="line-height: 20px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Regards,</span></div><div style="line-height: normal;"><span style="line-height: 20px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><div style="line-height: normal;"><span style="line-height: 20px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Dan</span></div><div style="line-height: normal;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"> Sample my Kindle books via:</span></div><div style="line-height: normal;"><font color="#000000" style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><a href="http://author.to/DanUst" style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">http://author.to/DanUst</a></font></div></div></div></body></html>