<div dir="ltr"><div>On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 5:25 PM, William Flynn Wallace <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:foozler83@gmail.com" target="_blank">foozler83@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Dave Sill <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sparge@gmail.com" target="_blank">sparge@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></span><div class="gmail_extra">Seems to me that's just a classic liberal arts education of the kind that was popular before colleges morphed into glorified trade schools.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">​Why 'just'?</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Because the article made it sound like this was some new innovation rather than a style of education that once widespread.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I wholeheartedly agree that a classical liberal arts education is worthwhile.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-Dave</div></div>