<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Stuart LaForge </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a href="mailto:avant@sollegro.com" target="_blank">avant@sollegro.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">> </div>My attempts to mathematically formulate my theory of causal cells has led<br>
me to an astonishing conclusion. The Schwarzschild metric predicts that<br>
causal cells and black holes are one and the same thing.We live in a black hole</blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font size="4">A few years ago the idea that </font></font><font size="4"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">causal cells and black holes</span> were <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">equivalent </span>was popular but the discovery that the universe is accelerating made holding that view much more difficult. Recently I saw a picture of a galaxy and the caption said it was <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">13.3 billion light years away, the most distant galaxy known. What that meant is that the light traveled for 13.3 billion years before it entered one of out telescopes, so that's what it looked like a very long time ago not now, </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">and due to the expansion of the universe today it is much further away than 13.3 billion light years, in fact it is in a very real sense infinitely far away today.</div></font></div><div class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline"><font size="4">The universe is not only expanding it is accelerating, so by now that galaxy is moving away from us faster than the speed of light. Space itself can move faster than light but spaceships can't so there is no way we could ever visit that galaxy in finite time, we can no longer influence it in any way and it can no longer influence us. And yet we can see it, so 13.3 billion years ago it must have been in our causal but it no longer is. If the universe were a black hole and that galaxy were in our black hole 13.3 billion years ago it still should be. But it isn't. So black holes and causal cells are not equivalent. Because of that acceleration as time goes on there is less and less stuff that we can influence and less and less stuff that can influence us.</font></div></div></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">> </div>I have the math to back it up</blockquote><div><br></div><div><font size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">It's not the math I'm worried about its the physics.</div> </font></div><div><font size="4"><br></font></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font size="4">John K Clark</font></div><br></div><div><br></div><br>
</div><br></div></div>