<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body>
    On 03/02/2020 21:08, Brent Allsop wrote:<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:mailman.266.1580764127.13152.extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org"><br>
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
              style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman",serif">Hi Ben,</span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
              style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman",serif"><br>
            </span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
              style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman",serif">You
              asked:</span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
              style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman",serif"> </span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
              style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman",serif">“</span><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,176,80);background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Now
              why
              on earth would the experience of redness suddenly become
              the experience of
              greenness? </span><i
              style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"><span
style="font-size:11pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,176,80);background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">How</span></i><span
style="font-size:11pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,176,80);background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"> could
              it?</span><span
style="font-size:11pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">”</span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"> </span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">By
              simply inverting the red green signal
              anywhere in the causal chain of events that is perception
              as proven can be done
              <a href="https://canonizer.com/videos/consciousness/"
                style="color:blue" moz-do-not-send="true">here</a> (skip
              to the “Inverted
              Perception” part).</span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"> </span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">It
              remains a fact that you could engineer (using
              just such inversions both upstream and downstream from
              physical knowledge) one
              robot to represent red knowledge with your redness, and
              another robot to
              represent red with your greenness.  See “<a
                href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_spectrum"
                style="color:blue" moz-do-not-send="true">Inverted
                Qualia</a>”)  They could both pick strawberries equally
              well.</span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><br>
          </p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">You
              seem to be admitting that you only use one
              word for all things “red”.  That is the definition
              of “Qualia Blindness”.  In that world
              there is an “<a
                href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanatory_gap"
                style="color:blue" moz-do-not-send="true">explanatory
                gap</a>” because you need at least two words (red and
              redness) to model simple effing of the
              ineffable ideas like: “My redness is like your greenness,
              both of which we call
              red.”  As long as we remain qualia blind, nobody can know
              the true physical color of anything.</span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"><br>
            </span></p>
          <p class="gmail-MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin:0in
            0in
0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">It's
              not a "hard mind body problem" it's just a color problem.</span></p>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I think we're done here. I see no point talking to a broken record.
    You keep referring to an incomprehenisble video with no explanation,
    showing images that seem to be taken from a child's encyclopaedia
    (that is NOT how our visual system actually works, it's just a vague
    simplification that probably does more to obscure than reveal), with
    some mysterious 'inversion' of what is assumed (wrongly) to be a
    simple 'colour signal'. And you totally ignore any attempt to
    actually progress the conversation, including very relevant
    questions. Instead, you keep going back constantly to the same stock
    (mostly meaningless, as far as I can see) phrases, using the same
    nonsense terminology. I may as well be talking to a chatbot.<br>
    <br>
    It seems to me that you've just invented your own little world, with
    almost no relation to reality, and are intent on repeating the same
    packaged phrases over and over again, without making any attempt to
    explain them or check them against what we actually know about how
    our brains work.<br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Ben Zaiboc</pre>
  </body>
</html>