<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body>
    On 27/09/2020 06:37, Adrian Tymes wrote:<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:mailman.78.1601185046.3037.extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">
      <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:38 AM Dave Sill via
            extropy-chat <<a
              href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50 PM Adrian
                  Tymes via extropy-chat <<a
                    href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <div class="gmail_quote">
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                    0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                    rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div dir="ltr">If these habitats are, say,
                        cylinders 2 km wide, to allow them to be spun up
                        to 1 G, that's enough of a technical (and
                        imposed-by-human-biology) standard that people
                        might not want to mess with it.  2 km wide
                        suggests maybe 5 km long maximum, for structural
                        stability.</div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>What about rotational stability? Wouldn't want
                    your habitats flipping when they're full of people.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a
                      href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VPfZ_XzisU"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VPfZ_XzisU</a></div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Per that video, you weight it so the axis of rotation
              is not the one that's going to cause that sort of
              flipping. </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    That would mean short, fat cylinders, not long thin ones, no?<br>
    <br>
    It's interesting that we hadn't really understood this until
    relatively recently. Makes me wonder what other physics we are still
    completely in the dark about.<br>
    <br>
    I'm also wondering if a long thin cylinder flipping about a
    perpendicular axis would be the disaster we are assuming (everything
    inside being thrown about). What forces would the people inside
    actually feel? Is it possible they wouldn't even notice unless they
    were looking out of the window? Maybe it would be a cool quirk of
    orbital habitats, and only be awkward for docking and astronomical
    observations, rather than disastrous.<br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Ben Zaiboc</pre>
  </body>
</html>