<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/08/2021 01:35, Adrian Tymes
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:mailman.11.1630024518.15478.extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">
        <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="ltr">On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:40 PM Ben Zaiboc
              via extropy-chat <<a
                href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div>
                  <div>Life-extension. That's how to solve population
                    growth problems. Sounds counter-intuitive ("won't
                    that make things worse?"), but do the maths. Not
                    only will it reduce population growth, but it will
                    encourage people to behave more responsibly, and I
                    have to say, even though I hate the term,
                    'sustainably'.</div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I'm not sure it would reduce population growth, but
                the rest of that sounds correct - so it would at least
                reduce the problems related to population growth. <br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <p>Graph showing effect of life-extension on population growth:<br>
      </p>
      <p><img moz-do-not-send="false"
          src="cid:part2.0C4B855E.3A7422BE@zaiboc.net" alt=""
          width="512" height="326"> <br>
      </p>
      <p>This assumes that extreme longevity will reduce the desire to
        have children, which seems a reasonable assumption, given the
        usual real reason for having kids (to look after you in your
        dotage). Note the extreme difference between having an average
        of 2.5 kids and 2. Note also that 2 kids per couple is no longer
        'replacement rate', as there is no death. Of course there still
        would be, but from accidents etc., not from ageing.</p>
      <p>I'm afraid I can't show you the actual calculatons behind this
        graph, I seem to have lost them, and am not competent enough to
        recreate them myself, but I'm sure many people reading this are.<br>
      </p>
      <p>Ben<br>
      </p>
      <br>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>