<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Hey cool, a contest.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>A version of the Turing test suggested that if a human and a computer were each given a question or prompt, humans would not be able to distinguish which intelligence wrote which response.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>OK, ChatGPT can write responses to prompts, but it is easy enough to tell if the answer is machine derived. We have software to detect when essays were written by ChatGPT, which is how that college was busted for having ChatGPT write a letter to the students after a campus shooting.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>It isn’t perfect, but that imperfection gives me an idea. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We could have a group of human competitors intentionally write in the kinda formal stilted way ChatGPT writes. Then a group of judges would look at the responses, exactly one of which is GPT generated, and try to figure out which one that is. We could have arbitrarily many competitors and arbitrarily many judges. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>A human competitor gets a point for each time they gets identified as the GPT. The GPT gets a point for each time it is identified as a human. In each round, there is no score if all the judges correctly identify the software-generated response. If the competitors fool all the judges then there are as many points awarded that round as there are judges.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I think I can write in GPT. Can you? Are you better at GPT than I am? Who is the champion GPT-er? Is it GPT? Or are humans better at GPT-ing now?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>spike<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>