<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:#000000">If all of this is moving in the direction of giving human rights to machines, I think it's wrong. bill w</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:59 AM Gadersd via extropy-chat <<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">There is nothing wrong with abusing a zombie but abusing a sentient creature is something generally considered wrong. If there is an animal or machine that acts as if it were conscious and we don’t have a way to distinguish acting from the real thing then we had better treat such entities as if they were conscious.<br>
<br>
> On Jun 21, 2023, at 7:21 AM, BillK via extropy-chat <<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> How could we distinguish conscious AI from its zombie equivalent?<br>
> The idea that consciousness emerges naturally alongside intelligence<br>
> could be an anthropocentric distortion.<br>
> June 20, 2023 Anil Seth<br>
> <br>
> <<a href="https://bigthink.com/the-future/intelligence-conscious-ai/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bigthink.com/the-future/intelligence-conscious-ai/</a>><br>
> <br>
> Quotes:<br>
> From the 16th-century golem to the replicants in Blade Runner, stories<br>
> of sentient human-like creatures tend to end in philosophical and<br>
> existential chaos.<br>
> The rapid rise of AI has lent fresh urgency to questions about machine<br>
> consciousness.<br>
> It is a mistake to assume that intelligence — at least in advanced<br>
> forms — is either necessary or sufficient for consciousness.<br>
> <br>
> Although intelligence offers a rich menu of ramified conscious states<br>
> for conscious organisms, it is a mistake to assume that intelligence —<br>
> at least in advanced forms — is either necessary or sufficient for<br>
> consciousness. If we persist in assuming that consciousness is<br>
> intrinsically tied to intelligence, we may be too eager to attribute<br>
> consciousness to artificial systems that appear to be intelligent, and<br>
> too quick to deny it to other systems — such as other animals — that<br>
> fail to match up to our questionable human standards of cognitive<br>
> competence.<br>
> --------------<br>
> <br>
> BillK<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> extropy-chat mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
extropy-chat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat</a><br>
</blockquote></div>