<br><br>On Saturday, August 26, 2023, efc--- via extropy-chat <<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello Stuart,<br>
<br>
Just a quick question from someone not very knowledgeable of cutting<br>
edge physics.<br>
<br>
You say that<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
that a copy of you can truly be you, then you can relax because you are already immortal. You don't need to copy yourself because there are already plenty of, if not infinite numbers of, you strewn about the multiverse.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
What I wonder is, are infinite numbers of you and multiverses supported by proof or is itone of many interpretations of current theories?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Anthropic considerations provide strong evidence, in the sense that the probability there's only one universe (with one kind of physics) is on the order of 1 in 10^122.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://alwaysasking.com/is-the-universe-fine-tuned/">https://alwaysasking.com/is-the-universe-fine-tuned/</a></div><div><br></div><div>This is as close to proof as anything science can provide.</div><div><br></div><div>Jason </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Best regards, Daniel<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Stuart LaForge<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This is a crucial point, for those of us interested in uploading, so I think we should really understand it, yet it makes no sense to me. Would you please explain further?<br>
<br>
Could you also please explain the comment about continuity and not-discontinuity not being the same thing?<br>
<br>
Ben<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
extropy-chat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat" target="_blank">http://lists.extropy.org/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat</a><br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
extropy-chat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat" target="_blank">http://lists.extropy.org/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
extropy-chat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat" target="_blank">http://lists.extropy.org/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat</a><br>
</blockquote>